Share
Save
JoLT-Ca Sublobar Resection (SR) Versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) for Lung Cancer
To Determine if SAbR improves survival over SR in High Risk Operable Stage I NSCLC.
Study details:
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy has been shown in single institution phase II and matched cohort studies to be effective at controlling primary early lung cancer. Recent pooled analysis of both the STARS and ROSEL randomized trials comparing SABR versus lobectomy have shown a significantly improved 3-year survival with SABR, giving further impetus for successful completion of a randomized trial . Pre-randomized trial- Patients will be screened and pre-randomized to either SR or SAbR.
Informed consent will be obtained after patients are made aware of the randomized assignment. Despite pre-randomization prior to consent, patients maintain their right to accept or decline any/all study activities. Only consenting patients will be allowed to participate in study activities, including observation after either randomized treatments or observation after standard of care treatment, while those declining consent will be managed by their physician(s) off study.
Patients will be accrued and followed for a minimum of 2-years after treatment.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 18 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2015-07-01
Primary completion: 2028-12-01
Study completion finish: 2028-12-01
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
PHASE3
Trial ID
NCT02468024
Intervention or treatment
PROCEDURE: Lung Surgery
RADIATION: Radiation therapy
Conditions
- • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Find a site
Closest Location:
St. Vincent's/Peter Mac
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
St. Vincent's/Peter Mac
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm 1 lung surgery
| PROCEDURE: Lung Surgery
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 2 radiation therapy
| RADIATION: Radiation therapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
overall survival | To test the hypothesis that the 3-year overall survival in high risk operable patients with Stage I NSCLC is greater in patient who undergo SAbR as compared to standard sublobar resection (SR). | 3 years |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
progression free survival | survival at 5-years for Stage I NSCLC who undergo SR or SAbR. | 5 years |
toxicity as assessed toxicity using the Common Toxicity Criteria | toxicity using the Common Toxicity Criteria | 3 years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!