Share
Save
High Intensity Interval Training in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
The fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILD) is a group of debilitating chronic lung conditions that are characterised by scarring of lung tissue, dyspnoea on exertion and significant physical impairment. Exercise training is recommended for people with fILD in improving breathlessness and exercise tolerance. However, despite the best efforts of patients and clinicians, many of those who participate are not attaining its benefits.
The current exercise training strategies of moderate intensity continuous training may not be well suited to fILD. High intensity interval training (HIIT), short bouts of high-intensity exercise regularly interspersed with periods of rest or light exercise may be an alternate exercise training option for people with fILD. The study will determine to whether HIIT is better than the current method of continuous exercise training at moderate intensity in improving exercise tolerance, breathlessness and quality of life in people with fILD.
A randomised controlled, assessor blinded trial will be conducted. A total 130 people with fILD will be randomly assigned to moderate intensity continuous training or HIIT. If this trial demonstrates that HIIT is effective, it will provide an exercise training strategy that can readily be implemented in practice that will maximise the outcomes of exercise training for people with fILD.
Study details:
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a chronic lung condition characterized by scarring of lung tissue. This stiffening of the lungs impairs breathing and reduces the amount of oxygen being delivered throughout the body limiting the ability to perform daily and physical activity. Around two-thirds of people with ILD have fibrotic ILD (fILD), a type of ILD, which typically has worse impairment and disability than other types of ILD.
There is no cure for these conditions, although there are two new pharmacological therapies that slow the decline in lung function in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), the most common type of fILD. These treatments however do not provide improvement in breathlessness, exercise capacity or health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Exercise training, or Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR), has shown to be effective at improving exercise tolerance and HRQoL in ILD.
The investigators recently demonstrated that, at a group level, exercise training exerts a positive effect across varying subtypes of ILD, including IPF, the most rapidly progressive of all the fILDs. However less than half of those with IPF who undertook the exercise training achieved meaningful improvements in exercise capacity. In addition, a large proportion of people with IPF were unable to keep up with the recommended exercise training level, often due to excessive dyspnoea or desaturation.
This suggests the current exercise training strategies used in PR, which were adopted from guidelines for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), may not provide the optimal exercise stimuli for fILD. High intensity interval training (HIIT), which is short bouts of high intensity exercise regularly interspersed with periods of rest or light exercise, may be an alternate exercise training option for people with fILD. However, it is unknown whether this kind of exercise training achieves superior benefits to the traditional model of PR.
The aim of this project is to determine whether HIIT is better than the current method of continuous exercise training at moderate intensity, in improving exercise capacity, breathlessness and HRQoL in people with fILD. A total 130 people with fILD will be recruited. The trial will be conducted at four hospital sites across Australia.
People who agree to take part in the study will be randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 will undergo the traditional PR model of moderate intensity continuous exercise training and group 2 will undergo HIIT. Participants in both groups will participate in exercise training twice weekly for eight weeks.
The participants will be monitored continuously during exercise by an experienced physiotherapist or exercise physiologist. At the beginning and the end of the eight weeks of exercise training, and six months later, participants will undergo measurements of exercise capacity and health status. This study will determine whether HIIT is effective, providing an important exercise training strategy that can be readily used for people with fILD to achieve positive benefits from PR.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 18 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2019-07-17
Primary completion: 2024-04-01
Study completion finish: 2024-10-01
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
NA
Trial ID
NCT03800914
Intervention or treatment
OTHER: High intensity interval training
OTHER: Traditional pulmonary rehabilitation
Conditions
- • Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Find a site
Closest Location:
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Prince Charles Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Austin Health
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Alfred Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: High Intensity Interval Training
| OTHER: High intensity interval training
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional pulmonary rehabilitation
| OTHER: Traditional pulmonary rehabilitation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
| Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in endurance time | Endurance time measured during constant work rate test (CWRT) at 75% of the peak work rate achieved on a baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
Secondary outcome
| Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in dyspnea measured using the Dyspnea-12 questionnaire | Dyspnea-12 is a uni-dimensional 12-item questionnaire divided in 2 domains: physical items (1 to 7) and affective items (8-12). Each item evaluate breathing experience and can be scored as: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2) or Severe (3). Results of this questionnaire will be reported as total score that can range from 0 to 36 and separate scores that can range from 0 to 21 for physical component and 0 to 15 for affective component. Higher scores indicate worse dyspnea. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Changes in fatigue evaluated by the Fatigue Severity Scale | Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), a self reported rating scale including 9 items to measure how fatigue affects motivation, exercise, physical functioning, carrying out duties and how fatigue interferes with work, family, or social life. Each item is scored on a 7 point scale in which 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. Total score range from 9 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Change in health related quality of life using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis specific version (SGRQ-I) | The SGRQ-I is a disease specific HRQoL measure with similar psychometric properties to the original SGRQ that is designed to be more relevant in patients with IPF. The questionnaire is divided in 3 domains: Symptoms (frequency and severity), Activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness) and Impact (social functioning and psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease). Values of each domain as well as the total score value will be reported. Each item is weighted based on empirical data. Total score and scores in each domain can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more limitations in quality of life. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Change in health related quality of life using the chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ) | The CRQ consists of 20 items across 4 domains: Dyspnea (activities that cause breathlessness and are performed frequently), fatigue, emotional function and mastery ( the patient's feeling of control over their disease). Each domain includes four to seven items, and each item is scored on a 7-point Likert score. Total scores for each domain range from 4-35. Values of each domain will be reported. Lower scores indicate more limitations in quality of life. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Change in anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a scale with 14 items divided into two domains : anxiety symptoms (7 items) and depression symptoms (7 items). Each item can be scored from 0 to 3. Scores from each domain can vary from 0 to 21 and are stratified as follows: 0-7 (indicates absence of anxiety/depression symptoms); 8-10 ( presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in moderate degree - borderline); 11 or more (significant number of anxiety/depression symptoms - confirmed cases). Score of each domain as well as number of confirmed cases will be reported. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Change in functional exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walk distance | Distance in meters achieved on a 6-minute walk test | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Changes in skeletal muscle size | Change in cross-sectional area of the Quadriceps will be measured by B-mode ultrasonography | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Dyspnea related disability - measured with modified medical research council scale (MMRC) | The MMRC rates dyspnea according to different levels activity on a 5-point scale (grade 0-4), with grade 4 representing the greatest level of dyspnea impairment. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Global rating of change | The global rating of change will assess the participants' overall self-perceived change in health by asking the participant to rate their change as either 'worse', 'about the same' or 'better'. The extent of change ( (i.e., worsening or improvement) is then graded on a Likert scale from one to seven. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
| Change in physical activity | Time spent sedentary and in physical activity of various intensities will be measured by a wrist-worn, tri-axial accelerometer. | Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!