Share
Save
INFORM2 Study Uses Nivolumab and Entinostat in Children and Adolescents With High-risk Refractory Malignancies
The aim of this trial is to determine preliminary activity of the combination treatment with nivolumab and entinostat in children and adolescents with high risk refractory/relapsed/progressive tumors harboring a high mutational load, focal MYC(N) amplification or ATRT-MYC subgroup as well as tumors with high tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or a tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS).
Study details:
Compared to adult cancers, most pediatric cancers carry a relatively low mutational burden. HDAC inhibition (HDACi) modifies T-cell regulation and can augment response to checkpoint inhibition by reducing the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and creating an immunogenic tumor microenvironment including induction of MHCI and neo-antigens. In vitro and in vivo models showed enhanced anti-tumor activity of the combination of checkpoint inhibition and HDACi compared to either agent alone.
This provides a strong rationale to combine these drug classes. Checkpoint inhibition results in activation of tumor-associated T cells. It is now becoming increasingly evident that patients with tumors with a high number of tumor infiltrating T cells at baseline show an increased response rate.
Additionally, recent clinical data on immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for melanoma patients detected tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) as indicators of an activated adaptive immune response. Their presence has been linked to objective treatment responses in patients with different cancer entities receiving ICI. Furthermore, MYC- or NMYC-driven (referred to as MYC(N)) malignancies like very high-risk medulloblastomas or very high-risk neuroblastomas still have a dismal outcome.
MYC is not only reported to upregulate PD-L1 and thereby a possible biomarker for checkpoint inhibition but also very compelling recent preclinical data strongly suggests that HDAC inhibitors are active against MYC amplified medulloblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In NMYC amplified neuroblastoma cell lines similar observations were made in vitro. In addition, it has been shown recently that the molecular MYC subgroup of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) exhibit a strong T-cell infiltrate in contrast to the SHH-ATRT subtype and are considered immunological "hot" tumors.
Taken together, our results suggest that MYC(N)-driven tumors depend on HDAC and we hypothesize that MYC(N) status can serve as a biomarker for response prediction to a combinatorial treatment of checkpoint inhibition and HDAC inhibition. Pediatric patients aged 2-21 years with refractory/relapsed/progressive high-risk malignancies with a high mutational load (group A), with MYC(N) amplification or from the ATRT-MYC subgroup (group C) as well as patients with high TILs and/or TLS positive (group E) are eligible for this trial. Phase I determines the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the combination of the HDACi entinostat and the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab for the age groups 6-11 and 12-21 years, respectively.
Phase II investigates activity in 3 groups A, C, E for patients in the two age cohorts 2-11 and 12-21 years. The duration of treatment is 12 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days), preceded by 1 priming week. In addition, a comprehensive accompanying research program investigates PD biomarkers for immune checkpoint and HDAC inhibition.
Clinical trials investigating the combination of nivolumab and entinostat in children have not been reported so far.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 2 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2020-05-26
Primary completion: 2026-06-30
Study completion finish: 2027-06-30
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
PHASE1
PHASE2
Trial ID
NCT03838042
Intervention or treatment
DRUG: Nivolumab and Entinostat
Conditions
- • Solid Tumor
- • CNS Tumor
Find a site
Closest Location:
Sydney Children's Hospital
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Sydney Children's Hospital
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Children's Hospital at Westmead
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Children's Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Perth Children's Hospital
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Nivolumab and Entinostat
| DRUG: Nivolumab and Entinostat
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Phase I: Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) of the combination treatment. | A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as any AE according to the definitions and exceptions listed below that is related to the administration of the combination of investigational agents occurring during the priming week and first cycle of combination treatment (first 5 weeks) in phase I of the trial. A study participant will be considered evaluable for a DLT if at least 2 doses of nivolumab and 4 doses of entinostat were administered during the first 5 weeks (5 weeks normally incorporate the priming week and 1 cycle of planned combination treatment). Participants who discontinue treatment or have treatment delays preventing them from receiving the above defined minimal amount of treatment in the first cycle of combination treatment for reasons unrelated to study drug toxicity, are not evaluable for DLT and will be replaced in enrollment (maximum number of replacement subjects will be 3 per dose level). | 5 weeks |
Phase II: Best response (CR or PR) | Best response (CR or PR) will be based on RANO criteria for all primary CNS tumors and RECIST for non-CNS tumors, defined for each patient as the best response under study combination therapy during the first 6 cycles (assessment every 2 cycles). Calcified or intra-osseous (osteo)sarcoma target lesions which were progressive before initiation of treatment and show SD on response evaluation (confirmation through a subsequent scan at least 4 weeks later) will be considered as a responder. | Change in 24 weeks |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of Response (DOR) | DOR will be evaluated for all patients who experienced (confirmed) response. Starting time point will be the time when best response was determined. | Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks |
Disease Control Rate (DCR) | DCR will be evaluated in addition, also using iRECIST and iRANO. | Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks |
Stable disease (SD) | SD will be evaluated in addition, also using iRECIST and iRANO. | Phase II: maximum of 12 cycles (each cycle is 28 days) |
Progression-free survival (PFS) | The event-time endpoint PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering all the patients who started the treatment, whatever their compliance to treatment, including if the treatment was stopped prematurely for a reason other than disease progression. 95%-Confidence intervals will be provided for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. | 4 years |
Time to Response (TTR) | The event-time endpoint TTR will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering all the patients who started the treatment, whatever their compliance to treatment, including if the treatment was stopped prematurely for a reason other than disease progression. 95%-Confidence intervals will be provided for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. | Phase II: maximum of 12 cycles (each cycle is 28 days) |
Overall Survival (OS) | The event-time endpoint OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering all the patients who started the treatment, whatever their compliance to treatment, including if the treatment was stopped prematurely for a reason other than disease progression. 95%-Confidence intervals will be provided for the Kaplan-Meier estimates. | Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks |
Immune related Response Rate (RR) measured by iRECIST criteria and iRANO criteria | As a secondary endpoint for patients who continued treatment beyond progression in case of clinical benefit, response as assessed by iRECIST or iRANO will be performed. | Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks |
Maximum Plasma Time (Tmax) | Time to reach the maximum concentration (hr). | one week |
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) | The peak plasma concentration of a drug after Administration (ng/mL) | one week |
Half-life | The time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value (hr) | one week |
Area under the curve (AUC) | The integral of the concentration-time curve (ng/mL·hr) | one week |
total Clearance (CI/F) | The total body clearance will be equal to the renal clearance + hepatic clearance + lung clearance (L/h/m²) | one week |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!