Share
Save
A Comparison of JointRep® and Microfracture in Repair of Cartilage Lesions on the Femoral Condyle or Trochlea,
The aim of the study is to compare whether JointRep® plus microfracture is more effective than microfracture alone when treating symptomatic focal articular cartilage lesions in the knee (femoral condyles or trochlea).
Study details:
The aim of the JMAC study, an international multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, is to assess the effectiveness and safety of JointRep®, a second-generation chitosan-based hydrogel for cartilage repair. A total of 185 subjects will be randomized 2:1 to either Microfracture plus JointRep® or Microfracture alone. The follow up will be at 24 months, with a planned interim analysis at 12 months.
The primary endpoint is an objectively measured structural one (quantity of new cartilaginous tissue, assessing the percentage of fill) and it will be blindly assessed using a quantitative MRI at 12 and 24 months. Two of the secondary endpoints are also structurally based and blindly measured: quality of the new tissue, quantifying the T2 (which measures the Collagen 2 content and orientation as well as degree of hydration); the upper and lower half of the new tissue T2 measurement will depict the degree of stratification of the new cartilaginous tissue. A semiquantitative MOCART-2 blinded analysis will also be carried out.
The clinical outcomes will be measured using KOOS and Tegner, as well as a VAS and an EQ-5 questionnaire. All the secondary endpoints will be analyzed at the same 12 and 24 months timepoints. In addition, subject safety will be assessed through a record of adverse events.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 18 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2021-09-22
Primary completion: 2025-12-01
Study completion finish: 2025-12-01
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
NA
Trial ID
NCT04840147
Intervention or treatment
DEVICE: JointRep®
PROCEDURE: Microfracture
Conditions
- • Chondral Defect
- • Articular Cartilage Defect
- • Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee
Find a site
Closest Location:
Canberra Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Canberra Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
Deakin, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Sydney Knee Specialists
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Lingard Private Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Orthosports
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
| DEVICE: JointRep®
|
OTHER: Control
| PROCEDURE: Microfracture
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Lesion fill. | Percentage of lesion fill measured by 3D quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI). | 24-months post procedure. |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual Analogue Scale. | Pain score in treated knee using the visual analogue scale from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) . | Baseline and then at 3-months, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months post procedure. |
T2 scores. | Difference in quantitative T2 scores between investigational subjects and control subjects measured by qMRI. | 12 and 24-months post procedure. |
Treatment failure. | Proportion of subjects who do not experience a treatment failure and achieve ≥80% lesion fill (success rate). | 24-months post procedure. |
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (pain, function, symptoms, sports/recreation and quality of life). 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems. | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. |
Tegner Activity Scale | Tegner activity scale provides a level of activity and is scored between 0 and 10. Level 0 is the worst activity level and Level 10 is the best activity level. | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. |
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue 2.0 (MOCART-2) score. | MOCART-2 score ranges form 0 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome) . | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. |
Euro Quality of Life-5D (EQ-5D) instrument for measuring quality of life. | EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) instrument for measuring quality of life has two parts. The first assesses health in five parts (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety depression) with each scored form 1 (best outcome) to 5 (worst outcome). The second part consists of a visual analogue scale rating perceived health form 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health). | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. |
Safety as Adverse Events related to the procedure | Evaluation of adverse events. | Baseline to 24-months post procedure. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!