Share
Save
FASST - Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Stimulant Trial
This study is a double-blind, placebo controlled, series of N-of-1 trials of individualised stimulant dose on ADHD symptomatology in children with FASD. The broad aim of this study is to contribute new evidence towards understanding treatment efficacy for ADHD symptoms in FASD. Specific aims are: 1.
To assess the ongoing effectiveness of stimulant medication prescribed for ADHD symptoms in individual children with FASD of clinically prescribed stimulant medication compared to placebo to control ADHD symptoms (using behavioural and cognitive measures) in children with FASD and ADHD using a N-of-1 trial design. 2. To obtain pilot data to examine feasibility and tolerability of the planned N-of-1 trial design in children with FASD and ADHD for future and larger studies that might seek to examine if the different stimulant types are equally effective relative to placebo.
3. To review the multiple N-of-1 data to analyze key individual factors that mediate the effect of stimulants relative to placebo on ADHD symptoms, including underlying child factors (attention skills, cognitive function), sociodemographic factors and other prenatal exposures.
Study details:
Study Design:. This is a single site, double-blind, placebo controlled, N-of-1 trial of clinically prescribed, individualised stimulant dose on ADHD symptomatology in children with FASD. The N-of-1 trial has four 2-week treatment blocks (each block consisting of 1 week active drug and 1 week placebo).
Interventions will include either prescribed stimulant (active drug) or matched placebo capsules, compared in four 2-week treatment blocks (each block consisting of 1 week active drug and 1 week placebo). Participants will be randomized to the sequence of the treatment arms. Randomisation will be in the two-week pairs - so the order of treatment (A) and placebo (P) to be randomly assigned within each two-week cycle.
Secondarily the investigators will collate outcomes across the N-of-1 trials and make use of a 'series' or multiple N-of-1 trial design18, chosen as it is a valid method of trial design for rare clinical disorders where individualized treatments are required. This design can result in robust evidence, assuming standards of methodological practice. 1 In an N-of-1 trial, each participant is assured of receiving both the study medication and placebo, and thus learns whether the treatment works specifically for them or not.
Study objectives:. 1. Primary objective:.
Test ongoing effectiveness of stimulant medication in individual children with FASD on pharmacotherapy for ADHD symptomatology, using individual N-of-1 trials. 2. Secondary objectives:.
Secondary objective 1: To examine feasibility and tolerability of the N-of-1 trial design in children with FASD and ADHD for future, larger studies that might seek to examine if the different stimulant types are equally effective relative to placebo. Secondary objective 2: Through quantitative analysis of a series of N-of-1 trials,1 explore individual factors that mediate the effect of stimulants relative to placebo on ADHD symptoms, on children with FASD, including underlying attention skills, cognitive function and other child/sociodemographic factors and additional prenatal exposures. Exploratory objectives: Investigators will review if there is any change in pediatrician patient management post trial.
Study Population:. Children (4-18 years) with FASD and ADHD seen by the Victorian Fetal Alcohol Service (VicFAS), prescribed stimulant medication for ADHD symptoms. The age limit selected was based on the age in which stimulants have been shown to be effective in controlling ADHD symptoms in the general population, and who are seen by the clinical service.
VicFAS assesses 20 children per year at the diagnostic clinic. All participants are currently approached for consent to the already established VicFAS database, which includes full child demographic, clinical and neurodevelopmental information as well as optional consent for future studies. Participants who have consented to this optional inclusion will be re-consented to this study.
A total of 20 participants will be approached for recruitment to the study. This will be a convenience sample of children seen through the VicFAS FASD diagnostic clinic since inception in September 2019 until study completion (n=20). Each participant will undergo repeated measures.
Estimation of the needed number of cross-overs (that is 'sample size' in N-of-1 studies) was based on having at least 80% power (β = 0. 20) to detect a 5. 9-point reduction.
With 36 observations per participant, (18 placebo, 18 active medication) we achieve \>80% power (alpha of 0. 05 will be used as the cut-off for significance, one-sided hypothesis test).
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 4 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2022-02-14
Primary completion: 2023-04-01
Study completion finish: 2023-07-01
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
PHASE4
Trial ID
NCT04968522
Intervention or treatment
DRUG: Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
DRUG: Placebo
DRUG: Methylphenidate hydrochloride
DRUG: Methylphenidate Hydrochloride 18 MG
DRUG: Dexamphetamine sulfate
Conditions
- • Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Find a site
Closest Location:
Monash Health
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Monash Health
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo comparator 2
| DRUG: Placebo
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Stimulant
| DRUG: Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in ADHD symptoms - teacher report - between placebo and stimulant | ADHD symptoms will be measured using the Conners 3rd Edition-Teacher (Conners 3-T), for 6-18 year old's and the Conners Early Childhood teachers/childcare providers (full length) form for participants 2-6 years. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 (0=never or rarely; 1=sometimes; 2=often; 3=very often). Test- retest values for the Conners scales indicate excellent temporal stability (ranging from .73 to 1.00). The T-score is norm referenced, with a mean of 50. The average range falls within one standard deviation of the mean (i.e., between 40 and 59). A higher score indicates more elevated symptoms. T score Guideline 70+Very Elevated Score 65-69 Elevated Score 40-59 Average score 60-64 High average score \< 40 Low score. Investigators will examine Inattentive and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Symptom Scales. Symptoms indicated for each subscale are summed to get total. | Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Change in ADHD symptoms - parent report - between placebo and stimulant | ADHD symptoms will be measured using the Conners 3rd Edition-Parent (Conners 3-P), for 6-18 year old's and the Conners Early Childhood parent (full length) form for participants 2-6 years. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 (0=never or rarely; 1=sometimes; 2=often; 3=very often). Test- retest values for the Conners scales indicate excellent temporal stability (ranging from .73 to 1.00). The T-score is norm referenced. The average range falls within one standard deviation of the mean (i.e., between 40 and 59). A higher score indicates more elevated symptoms. T score Guideline 70+Very Elevated Score 65-69 Elevated Score 40-59 Average score 60-64 High average score \< 40 Low score. Investigators will examine Inattentive and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Symptom Scales. Symptoms indicated for each subscale are summed to get the total. | Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Change in spatial working memory - between placebo and stimulant | Spatial Working Memory (SWM) task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. SWM is a component of cognitive executive function which is measured by SWM task of CANTAB between the errors. The ability to retain spatial information and manipulate remembered items in working memory will be measured with the SWM task of CANTAB which is self-ordered and assesses the individual's ability to strategise. Between search errors will be analysed. Scores are raw scores, with no normative data available. Higher error score indicated poorer performance. Scale does not have a maximum range. | Day 3 of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Change in Visual Information Processing - between placebo and stimulant | Rapid Visual Information Processing (SOC) from Cantab. SOC Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) is a test of spatial planning that requires individuals to use problem-solving strategies to match two sets of stimuli. The participant must move the balls in the bottom display to copy the pattern shown in the top display. The balls are moved one at a time by selecting the required ball, then selecting the position to which it should be moved. The participant is instructed to make as few moves as possible to match the two pattern. The outcome measure of this subtest is the number of problems completed, regardless of whether the maximum moves limit was reached on any problem. | Day 3 of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in child problem behaviour rating- between placebo and stimulant | Top Problem Rating. This will be used as a brief but robust measure of child emotional and behavioural difficulties as rated by the parent. Top Problems Assessment (TPA) is a brief, idiographic procedure that allows clinicians and researchers to identify problems of children that are especially important from the perspective of the caregiver. The severity of these problems, once identified, will monitored daily. The overall severity of problem rating (0 - 4) between placebo and active medication arms will be used as an indicator of problem worsening or improving. as one index of whether improvement is occurring. A higher problem rating indicates greater perceived difficulties. | Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Change in functional Impairment- between placebo and stimulant | Impairment resulting from ADHD symptoms. This scale contains the items that are most likely to represent the participant's target of treatment. The instrument uses a Likert scale such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The scale is scored generating the total score. When defining impairment for DSM-IV, any domain with at least two items scored 2, one item scored 3 or a mean score \>1.5 is impaired. | Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Difference in side effects during placebo and stimulant phase | Investigators will monitor side effects of the placebo and active medication using the Barkley Side Effects Rating Scale (17 symptoms; 0 = absent, severity rated from 1 to 9). Parent ratings of side effects for the drug and placebo conditions will be described using the mean total side effect rating for each condition. | Day 5 of each trial week (8 weeks total) |
Trial feasibility - recruitment rate | Feasibility of the study (n-of-1 design) will be explored using trial recruitment rate across the trial from study start to study close. Investigators will calculate recruitment feasibility as the percentage of eligible participants agreeing to participate. A higher percentage will indicate greater participation. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Trial feasibility - completion rate | Feasibility of the study (n-of-1 design) will be explored using completion rates across the trial from study start to study close. Completion rate will be the percentage of enrolled participants who complete the trial. A higher percentage will indicate greater participation. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Compliance | Investigators will inspect participant medication diaries, to calculate treatment compliance. Non-compliance will be defined as missing more than one or more days of the active drug or placebo condition. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Assessment completion rate | Investigators will calculate the percentage of outcome assessments completed by each participant to examine assessment feasibility of the study design. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Data completion reason | Investigators will also examine reasons for incomplete outcome data. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Adverse events | Adverse events (AE's) will be coded using the, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and calculated once each per participant. We will describe the total number of AE's across the trial. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!