Share
Save
RESOLUTE Trial Aims to Investigate the Value of Adding Local Ablative Treatment to Standard Systemic Treatment for Unresectable Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer
This study aims to assess the clinical benefit of local ablative therapy (LAT) following initial standard first-line systemic treatment including the impact on survival, compared to continued standard first-line systemic treatment for oligometastatic colorectal cancer.
Study details:
Who is this study for:. Adults with unresectable oligo-metastatic colorectal who have demonstrated treatment benefit (partial response or stable disease as per RECIST criteria) after 3-4 months of standard first-line systemic treatment. Study details.
Participants will be randomly allocated to either a LAT arm, who will receive metastasis-directed LAT such as radiotherapy or thermal ablation following initial standard first-line systemic treatment, or a control arm who will receive continued first-line systemic treatment alone. Those receiving LAT will return to systemic treatment 16 weeks post-randomisation. Information on progression-free survival and treatment outcomes will be collected.
Data from this study will inform investigators of the potential benefit of local ablative therapy in the therapeutic setting for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 18 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2021-12-14
Primary completion: 2024-06-14
Study completion finish: 2025-06-14
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
NA
Trial ID
NCT05862051
Intervention or treatment
PROCEDURE: Local Ablative Therapy
PROCEDURE: Standard first-line systemic treatment
Conditions
- • Colorectal Cancer
- • Oligometastatic Disease
Find a site
Closest Location:
Border Medical Oncology
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Border Medical Oncology
Albury, New South Wales, Australia
Bendigo Hospital
Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Eastern Health
Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
The Northern Hospital
Epping, Victoria, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Local ablative therapies (LAT) arm
| PROCEDURE: Local Ablative Therapy
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control arm
| PROCEDURE: Standard first-line systemic treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Progression free survival (PFS) | To compare the efficacy of metastasis-directed LAT following initial standard first-line systemic treatment vs continued first-line systemic treatment alone, as measured by Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 12 Months from randomisation |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall survival | To compare the efficacy of LAT following initial standard first-line systemic treatment, compared to continued first-line systemic treatment alone, as measured by Overall Survival (OS) | 12 Months from randomisation and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Efficacy of local ablative therapy | To compare the efficacy of LAT following initial standard first-line systemic treatment, compared to continued first-line systemic treatment alone, on: 1. time to development of new metastatic lesions. 2. time to initiation of 2nd line systemic treatment. | 12 Months from randomisation and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Time to progression following local ablative therapy | To assess the time to progression of LAT treated lesions. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Systemic treatment-free interval | To compare systemic treatment-free interval between the two treatment groups. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Rate of high-grade toxicities | To assess and compare rate of high-grade (Grade 3-5) toxicities between the two treatment groups. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Quality of life measure | To compare quality of life measures between the two treatment groups using patient questionnaire - The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) using the 4-point ordinal scale (not at all, a little, quite a bit and very much) | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!