Share
Save
Acuity 200™ (Fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear
The objective of this clinical investigation is to collect scientifically valid safety and effectiveness data on the Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear. The clinical performance data reported from this study is intended to be submitted to the U. S.
Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) in support of a new Premarket Application (PMA).
Study details:
Orthokeratology is an alternative method to correct refractive errors using individually designed gas permeable (rigid) lenses worn overnight to temporarily modify the curvature of cornea. Modern orthokeratology technology uses highly permeable rigid lens material and dynamic reverse geometry designs to allow faster and more effective corneal reshaping. Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) is a stable material with relatively higher oxygen permeability compared to other marketed gas permeable materials.
The clinical effects of wearing contact lenses that limit oxygen supply have been extensively reported with potential complications related to hypoxia including corneal swelling, epithelial microcysts, limbal hyperemia, corneal vascularization, refractive error changes and corneal distortion. Given the significantly higher oxygen permeability characteristics of Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) relative to currently FDA approved orthokeratology materials, the material is well-suited for overnight wear applications-such as orthokeratology, when the eye is subject to hypoxic conditions during sleep. The objective of the clinical investigation (AVDR 2022-01) is to collect scientifically valid safety and effectiveness data on the Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear.
The clinical performance data reported from the study is intended to be submitted to the U. S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) in support of a new Premarket Application (PMA).
The hypothesis is that the primary and secondary outcomes for safety and effectiveness are consistent with currently marketed devices approved by the FDA for overnight orthokeratology.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 7 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2023-09-01
Primary completion: 2025-03-01
Study completion finish: 2025-07-01
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
NA
Trial ID
NCT06009458
Intervention or treatment
DEVICE: Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear
Conditions
- • Myopia
Find a site
Closest Location:
Innovative Eye Care
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Innovative Eye Care
Adelaide, Not Specified, Australia
Richard Lindsay and Associates
Balwyn North, Not Specified, Australia
Custom Eyecare Newcastle
Cooks Hill, Not Specified, Australia
Eyeconic Optometry
Southport, Not Specified, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear
| DEVICE: Acuity 200™ (fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Lines of improvement of monocular UCVA at the 12-month visit (overall and stratified by baseline sphere) | The number of lines of change in acuity (for an eye) is defined as the difference in the logMAR acuities, scored to the letter, multiplied by 10. Each line difference represents 0.1 logMAR acuity. The improvement in acuity is represented by a numerical reduction in the logMAR value. The primary effectiveness endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults) . | 1 year |
Attempted vs. Achieved Reduction in manifest refractive error | proportion of eyes with manifest sphere within ±0.50 D, ±1.00 D, and ±2.00 D of the target (plano) at the 12-month post-dispensing visit (overall and stratified by baseline sphere). The primary effectiveness endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults) . | 1 Year |
Proportion of eyes achieved UCVA of ≤0.30 logMAR , ≤0.20 logMAR ,≤0.10 logMAR, and ≤0.00 logMAR | Proportion of eyes at the 1-month visit (and later visit intervals) that have achieved UCVA of ≤0.30 logMAR, ≤0.20 logMAR, ≤0.10 logMAR, and ≤0.00 logMAR for the whole cohort and stratified by pre-treatment refractive bin. The primary effectiveness endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and22 years and older (adults) . | 1 Year |
Treatment stability | Treatment stability as measured by the percentage of eyes that change by less than ±0.50 diopters manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) between two consecutive visits (baseline and 1-month, 1 and 3-month, 3 and 6-month, 6 and 9-month, and 9 and 12-month) The primary effectiveness endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults) . | 1 Year |
Number and rates (by type of event and relation to device) of serious and significant adverse events occurred at any visit | Number and rates (by type of event and relation to device) of serious and significant adverse events occurred at any visit. The primary safety endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults). | 1 Year |
Number and rates (by type of event) of all types of adverse events that were not classified as serious or significant adverse events. | Number and rates (by type of event) of all types of adverse events that were not classified as serious or significant adverse events. The primary safety endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults). | 1 Year |
All slit lamp results will be tabulated and findings above grade 2 will be evaluated and explained in relation to the treatment | All slit lamp results will be tabulated and findings above grade 2 will be evaluated and explained in relation to the treatment. The primary safety endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults). | 1 Year |
Number and rate of cases of loss from baseline to any post-dispensing visit of: monocular best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 2 or more lines (≥ 0.2 logMar), and 1 or more lines (≥ 0.1 logMar). | Number and rate of cases of loss from baseline to any post-dispensing visit of: monocular best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 2 or more lines (≥ 0.2 logMar), and 1 or more lines (≥ 0.1 logMar). The primary safety endpoints described above will also be stratified by subjects' baseline age (including 7 to 11 years (children), 12 to 21 years (adolescents), and 22 years and older (adults). | 1 Year |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
A set of descriptive statistics of improvement of monocular UCVA at all visits (1 month or later), as well as stratified by baseline sphere and by spherical equivalent. | A set of descriptive statistics of improvement of monocular UCVA at all visits (1 month or later), as well as stratified by baseline sphere and by spherical equivalent. | 1 Year |
Change in best corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCSVA) from at all visits stratified by baseline pretreatment diopteric group. | Change in best corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCSVA) from at all visits stratified by baseline pretreatment diopteric group. | 1 Year |
Pre-treatment manifest sphere in comparison to post-treatment manifest sphere stratified by dioptric power for all completed subjects at the 1 month visit and later visit intervals (3, 6, 9, and 12 month visits) | Pre-treatment manifest sphere in comparison to post-treatment manifest sphere stratified by dioptric power for all completed subjects at the 1 month visit and later visit intervals (3, 6, 9, and 12 month visits) | 1 Year |
A level of attempted versus achieved reduction in manifest refractive error- proportion of eyes with manifest sphere within ±0.50 D, ±1.00 D, and ±2.00 D of the target (plano) at all other visits (1 month or later) | A level of attempted versus achieved reduction in manifest refractive error- proportion of eyes with manifest sphere within ±0.50 D, ±1.00 D, and ±2.00 D of the target (plano) at all other visits (1 month or later) (overall and stratified by baseline sphere). | 1 Year |
Corneal topography changes (in simulated keratometry flat and steep meridia) from baseline to 12-month post-dispensing visit (overall and stratified by baseline sphere). | Corneal topography changes (in simulated keratometry flat and steep meridia) from baseline to 12-month post-dispensing visit (overall and stratified by baseline sphere). | 1 Year |
An analysis of corneal topography for changes in eccentricity from baseline to 12-month visit | An analysis of corneal topography for changes in eccentricity from baseline to 12-month visit | 1 Year |
An analysis of change in absolute corneal astigmatism from baseline to 12-month visit | An analysis of change in absolute corneal astigmatism from baseline to 12-month visit | 1 Year |
Number of discontinued subjects and the reasons of discontinuation. | Number of discontinued subjects and the reasons of discontinuation. | 1 Year |
An analysis of the relationship between changes in simulated keratometry and corresponding reductions in manifest sphere at all scheduled visits (1 month and later). | An analysis of the relationship between changes in simulated keratometry and corresponding reductions in manifest sphere at all scheduled visits (1 month and later). | 1 Year |
Number and rates of average wear time per day at all scheduled visits (1 day and later) | Number and rates of average wear time per day at all scheduled visits (1 day and later). | 1 Year |
An analysis of the effects of wearing time on uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at all visits (1 month and later) | An analysis of the effects of wearing time on uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at all visits (1 month and later). | 1 Year |
Stability of monocular UCVA change by post-lens removal hours for the sub-group of up to 40 participants at a single day visit (at 3-month or any later visits) - stratified by baseline MRSE. | Stability of monocular UCVA change by post-lens removal hours for the sub-group of up to 40 participants at a single day visit (at 3-month or any later visits) - stratified by baseline MRSE. | 1 Year |
Stability of manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) change by post-lens removal hours for the sub-group of up to 40 participants at a single day visit (at 3-month or any later visits) - stratified by baseline MRSE. | Stability of manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) change by post-lens removal hours for the sub-group of up to 40 participants at a single day visit (at 3-month or any later visits) - stratified by baseline MRSE. | 1 Year |
Increase in corneal/refractive astigmatism of 2D or more and 1D or more post-treatment as compared to baseline | Increase in corneal/refractive astigmatism of 2D or more and 1D or more post-treatment as compared to baseline. | 1 Year |
Signs/symptoms and complications from subjective questionnaires and reported during the study | Signs/symptoms and complications from subjective questionnaires and reported during the study. | 1 Year |
Descriptive statistics of IOP (Interocular Pressure) and for percent change from baseline of IOP value will be provided at 6-month, 12-month, and post-treatment 1-month visit. | Descriptive statistics of IOP (Interocular Pressure) and for percent change from baseline of IOP value will be provided at 6-month, 12-month, and post-treatment 1-month visit. | 1 Year |
Descriptive statistics of specular microscopy measurements for percent change from baseline of specular microscopy measurements will be provided at 12-month visit | Descriptive statistics of specular microscopy measurements ( Endothelial Cell Morphology Analysis (Cell density (cells/mm2), Polymegathism (CV) and Pleomorphism (percentage of hexagonal cells)) and for percent change from baseline of specular microscopy measurements will be provided at 12-month visit. | 1 Year |
Descriptive statistics of central corneal thickness (micron) and for percent change from baseline of central corneal thickness will be provided for post-dispensing visits at 3-month, 12-month and post-treatment 1-month visits | Descriptive statistics of central corneal thickness (micron) and for percent change from baseline of central corneal thickness will be provided for post-dispensing visits at 3-month, 12-month and post-treatment 1-month visits. | 1 Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!