Share
Save
Individualised Dose Optimisation of Ganciclovir in Immunocompromised Children Trial (ID-MAGIC)
This study is being conducted at seven major children's hospitals in Australia and New Zealand to test a new approach for treating a virus, called cytomegalovirus in children with weakened immune systems. The researchers want to find out if using a web app to customise the dose of a medication called ganciclovir is better at clearing the virus over a six-week period compared to the standard method of giving the medication.
Study details:
Immunocompromised children between 1 months to 18 years with cytomegalovirus viraemia who are admitted to one of the participating sites will be enrolled into the trial if eligible (see eligibility criteria) and randomly allocated into two groups. Children in the 'control- standard dosing group' will receive standard intravenous ganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia at a standard dosing of at 5mg/kg IV BD. Children in the "intervention: individualised dosing using a web app group" will receive a personalised intravenous ganciclovir dose calculated using an individualised IV ganciclovir dosing app.
This approach considers the patient's weight, creatinine level, and target drug exposure, allowing for tailored dosing based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters. The virological clearance by 6 weeks of the children in each of the two groups will be compared.
Eligibility criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. See if you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligibility
Age eligible for study : 1 and older
Healthy volunteers accepted : No
Gender eligible for study: All
Things to know
Study dates
Study start: 2024-10-29
Primary completion: 2028-06-01
Study completion finish: 2028-12-01
Study type
TREATMENT
Phase
PHASE2
Trial ID
NCT06574789
Intervention or treatment
DRUG: Standard dosing of IV ganciclovir
DRUG: Personalised dosing of IV ganciclovir
Conditions
- • Cytomegalovirus Viraemia
Find a site
Closest Location:
Perth Children's Hospital
Research sites nearby
Select from list below to view details:
Perth Children's Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Sydney Children's Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
The Children's Hospital at Westmead
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Queensland Children's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control: standard dosing
| DRUG: Standard dosing of IV ganciclovir
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Intervention: individualised dosing using a web app
| DRUG: Personalised dosing of IV ganciclovir
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure | Primary Outcome Description | Primary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The proportion of participants who achieve CMV virological clearance by 6 weeks | CMV virological clearance by 6 weeks to be compared between the two treatment groups. \* Virological clearance defined as two consecutives negative CMV polymerase chain reaction results, or detectable but CMV viral load is less than the lower limit of detection. Separated by at least 72 hours by 6-weeks (42 days) after randomisation. | 42 days |
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measure | Secondary Outcome Description | Secondary Outcome Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The proportion of participants who achieve CMV virological clearance before 3-weeks | The proportion of children who achieve virological clearance before 3-weeks (21 days) to be compared between the two treatment arms. Virological clearance defined as two consecutives negative CMV polymerase chain reaction results, or detectable but CMV viral load is less than the lower limit of detection. Separated by at least 72 hours. | 21 days |
The proportion of participants who develop CMV disease by 6 weeks | The proportion of children who develop CMV disease by 6 weeks to be compared between the two treatment groups. CMV disease assessed by the treating clinician based on signs/symptoms of disease followed by microbiological confirmation at the 6-week assessment. | 42 days |
Difference between treatment groups in All-cause mortality by 6 months | All-cause mortality by 6 months to be compared between the two treatment groups. All-cause mortality assessed by chart ± telephone review by the research team at 6-month timepoint. | 6 months |
The proportion of participants who develop drug resistant CMV infection by 6 months | The proportion of children who develop drug resistant CMV infection by 6 months to be compared between the two treatment groups. Children with refractory or further CMV infections following resolution of the initial infection will be evaluated for CMV-resistance through gene testing (UL97 and UL54). | 6 months |
The proportion of participants with treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) | The proportion of children with any treatment-related AEs to be compared between the two treatment groups. Assessed at end of treatment or at 6 weeks (whichever is later) by the treating team. | 42 days |
Change in Quality of Life measured over 6 months using the EQ-5D-Y Questionnaire. | Quality of Life (QoL) over the 6-month period following randomisation to be compared between the two treatment groups using the QoL EQ-5D-Y questionnaire, assessed at 7 days, 42 days and 180 days. The EQ-5D-Y descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, looking after oneself, doing usual activities, having pain or discomfort and feeling worried, sad or unhappy. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems and a lot of problems. The final question measures how good or bad the participants' health is that day on a scale from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health they can imagine and 0 means the worst health they can imagine. | 7 days, 42 days, 180 days |
Difference between treatment groups in cost-effectiveness over the 6-month period following randomisation | The total sum of all hospital and patient/family resources required per patient over the 6-month period to be compared between the two treatment groups. | 6 months |
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note: some questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients or using AI, and have not been verified by Clinrol
No questions submitted. Be the first to ask a question!